DOJ Has Concerns About Marijuana Banking Bill, Newly Surfaced Memo Reveals

The Department of Justice sent a memo to the congressional lawmakers about a marijuana banking bill that’s expected to be taken up imminently, saying the legislation as drafted could “significantly complicate law enforcement investigations and prosecutions” of crimes involving other drugs or money laundering.

However, the agency did suggest that the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act is fixable from its perspective and offered guidance on how to resolve various issues.

The memo, first noted by Punchbowl News, is reportedly the result of a request from Republican senators for DOJ to analyze the bill.

“Because marijuana would remain illegal under federal law, Congress should ensure efforts to provide access to financial services for state-legal businesses does not unintentionally erect obstacles to prosecution of other illicit activity or activities involving money laundering of proceeds of other illegal drugs or sales of marijuana that do not comply with state requirements,” DOJ wrote.

The SAFE Banking Act “purports to exempt the proceeds of ‘cannabis-related legitimate businesses’ from certain money laundering statutes,” it said. “This exemption is drafted broadly and could create an immunity shield around activities of cannabis businesses that involve other illicit drugs or activities.”

To address the issue, DOJ said that the exemption “should be limited to the proceeds of ‘cannabis-related legitimate businesses’ derived from marijuana-related activities in compliance with state law.”

Another key concern, according to the department, is a possible implication for money laundering prosecutions that it says may be inadvertently shielded in the House-passed legislation, which is expected to be a major component of a bill that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is finalizing for the lame duck session, that’s been referred to as “SAFE Plus.”

“The bill would essentially create a possible defense to a money laundering charge—and an extra burden of proof for investigators and prosecutors, who would have to show that a targeted marijuana-related business or the activity from which the proceeds derived had not operated in accordance with applicable state laws,” DOJ said.

“This could significantly complicate law enforcement investigations and prosecutions,” it continued. “For example, a marijuana-related business could be laundering proceeds from fentanyl sales on the side, or from marijuana sales conducted outside of the state regulatory framework.”

Despite the concerns, a DOJ official said in an email obtained by Punchbowl that the department “believes it can effectively implement the legislation” if some minor changes are made.

The memo itself says that DOJ “would be happy to work with Congress on ways” to improve the bill.

A reporter from the outlet clarified that while the document is just coming to public attention now, it was first circulated to lawmakers in the spring. As such, it’s not clear what impact it will have on the latest state of negotiations on cannabis banking during the lame duck session.

Advocates have eagerly awaited the text of SAFE Plus. It’s possible that it could be unveiled as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) ahead of a House Rules Committee meeting on that large-scale legislation that’s scheduled for Monday.

The House has already included the original SAFE Banking language in its versions of NDAA this year and last year. While the Senate refused to sign off on passing the reform as part of the bill in 2021, chamber leaders’ shifting posture toward the measure has left advocates more hopeful that the legislation could be the vehicle to enact it this time around.

Meanwhile, the DOJ memo also suggests smaller, technical changes to the bill.

One surrounds the use of the term “legitimate” to describe cannabis businesses.

“Using the word ‘legitimate’ does not take account of the fact that the bill does not legalize marijuana under federal law,” the Department said. “As a result, we recommend striking ‘legitimate’ from the bill’s text. If a replacement adjective is needed, ‘state-sanctioned’ or ‘locally sanctioned’ is preferable to ‘legitimate.’

DOJ also takes issue with language that appears to cover cannabis businesses that are sanctioned at the county or municipal level without being licensed by states.

Additionally, the department has technical concerns on issues related to suspicious activity reports (SARs) that banks must file regarding cannabis clients as well as a proposed Government Accountability Office study on SARs.

It remains to be seen if the content of the SAFE Banking Act itself will be changed to address DOJ’s issues, but the sponsors have separately faced pressure from certain advocates to revise the language in ways that would provide for more targeted industry equity that they say is currently lacking.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter (D-CO), the House sponsor of the legislation, said on Tuesday that he sees signs that the Senate will finally act on the banking reform during the lame duck session—but he is cautioning that he’s “been disappointed before.”

Talks on the omnibus bill have been intensifying in recent weeks, with Schumer discussing the proposal with key bipartisan senators. But as Perlmutter noted, time is running short, and advocates say it’s critical that the Senate act soon given that Republicans will have the majority in the House following this month’s election.

Schumer said in October that Congress is getting “very close” to introducing and passing the marijuana banking and expungements bill, citing progress he’s made in discussions with a “bunch of Republican senators.”

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), meanwhile, said following the election that Democrats who want to enact cannabis reform must either do it “now” during the lame duck session or wait until “many years from now” when his party has a shot at controlling Congress again.

For some advocates, support for the so-called “SAFE Plus” package will be largely contingent on what happens with the banking language, as they’re discontent with the current provisions that have passed the House in some form seven times now.

Specifically, they’d like to see the bill amended to provide funding for Minority Deposit Institutions (MDIs) and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) that lend commercial loans to minority-owned businesses.

They’re further calling for changes to require banks that work with the cannabis industry to demonstrate non-discrimination in lending, as Supernova Women Executive Director Amber Senter wrote in a recent op-ed for Marijuana Moment.

These amendments align with some of the SAFE Banking Act recommendations that Cannabis Regulators of Color Coalition (CRCC) outlined in a paper sent to legislative leaders in August.

The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA), meanwhile, sent a letter to Senate leadership on Monday, calling for a floor vote on the SAFE Banking Act “without further delay” by the year’s end.

“This legislation enjoys strong, bipartisan support, would resolve a conflict between state and federal law, and addresses a critical public safety concern,” ICBA, which commissioned a poll demonstrating that support earlier this year, said. “We urge its enactment without further delay.”

Another poll released on Monday found that three in four American voters—including bipartisan majorities—support ending federal marijuana prohibition, expunging prior convictions and allowing banks to work with state-legal cannabis businesses.

Read the full DOJ memo on cannabis banking below:

Senator Files Bill To Get Country Ready For Federal Marijuana Legalization Amid Heightened Reform Talks

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.

Source link

Previous Florida Ag Commissioner Blasts Governor Over Cancelled Clemency Meeting That Could've Involved Marijuana Pardons
Next Democrats' Focus On Social Justice Marijuana Bills Has Blocked Achievable Progress On Reform (Op-Ed)